Re-Emphasizing Communications
Manufacturers, like most industries, must deal with variation in working locations. To bridge connectivity, many of those surveyed have dialed into targeting communication and interactions. Those with in-person and hybrid work models are utilizing mandatory days in the office to hold team meetings or collaborative bonding activities. For benefits or encouragement, many provide food or some type of bonus. S&C Electric Company’s Finance & Accounting team found many team members wanted more in-person interaction, so they regularly hold lunch and learns and other interactive opportunities. These focus on understanding the business and learning about each other.
Top 5 Tools to Enhance Productivity and Communication
Source: Manufacturers Alliance member survey, 2024.
Many respondents with hybrid or remote employees shared that their companies used communications tools and video conferencing on a routine basis—although the consistency of “cameras on” was mixed. One manufacturer said they try to “be accessible via chat, phone, text, etc. when employees need to interact, just like an in-office ‘open door.’” Lyne Pagé of BRP meets with her team three times a week for 15-minute touchpoints to encourage social interaction and team camaraderie, in addition to their structured team meeting, a longstanding practice.
Surprisingly, effective and very effective communication trended higher the more days remote. Over half of respondents in the 3-4, and 5-day category reported very effective communication, and those with very effective communication cited having less of a challenge with limited face-to-face interaction and less feelings of isolation. Those working fully remote generally have a different mindset about what is required to create connections and are often more prepared to take full advantage of in-person interactions.
One manufacturer shared, “We are a remote company, so it's a way of life. Budget has been provided for in-person meetings. Most people travel at least once a year for such a meeting, with many traveling about once a quarter.” Another shared: "Our organization is working hard to keep people feeling connected and those near offices do have more opportunities now. We have also resumed in-person meetings, such as finance or sales conferences, to bring teams together. It's a worthwhile investment."
Yet another summed it up very efficiently: “Give employees a reason to be in the office.”
Leadership, Training, and Encouraging Engagement
At the team level, we found that diversity and human resource departments are building a strategy by deploying training on managing a remote team and by having in-person meetings intentionally to build trust.
“We've found it to be critically important to have regular, intentional in-person gatherings to help build rapport and trust within teams,” said one manufacturer. “Also, for our hybrid employees, having a structured approach has been helpful with a formal remote work program that provides guardrails for managers to follow versus just telling people, ‘We want you in the office around 3 days a week.’”
Marketing and sales emphasized accessibility, and while most of them liked remote work, they still encouraged being in person and leadership opportunities. Compliance and legal focused more so on the importance of a team, wanting junior-level remote workers on teams to have more leadership or supervision.
Many manufacturers have noted the challenges of on-boarding new employees and connecting more junior staff. One respondent shared “More seasoned professionals make the change to remote work fairly easily. They know what to do and do it. Those professionals early in their careers find remote work difficult as they miss out on hands-on learning and social interactions. They are less productive, need more coaching and handholding and monitoring, and benefit more from in-person events, whether for training, problem-solving, or social.”
Other manufacturers agreed and mentioned similar observations. “The challenges facing remote workers who are more junior in their career are the greatest as they miss out on opportunities to receive mentoring, training, and build community."
BRP’s Pagé shared, “It’s more difficult for newer people, to transport that to a sense of belonging as you’re an implant coming into an organization with its own vocabulary, its own habits.”
And what about those managers overseeing hybrid or remote workers? That has unique challenges as well. “It is difficult to develop leadership qualities in remote work employees,” said one manufacturer. “Leadership and leadership qualities are developed through observation."
Some organizations are starting to look at training to address this growing issue. "We are finding a significant gap in our managers' ability to manage a remote workforce," said one manufacturer.
Since engaging employees has become more critical than ever, companies are spending a lot of energy to figure out what works. Gone are the days of virtual water coolers or virtual happy hours that once gathered many colleagues online as they have gotten stale. Informal chat channels for vacation pictures, family updates, sports, or other topics that people want to share ebb and flow in popularity. There is an ongoing evaluation of what can be done to bring together people across virtual formats.
We heard this at the team level too. So far, engagement tactics have been very decentralized. Who should be responsible for engagement? For Lyne Pagé of BRP, she votes middle-to-upper managers: “It’s my responsibility to integrate my employees and make them feel comfortable,” encouraging a sense of community and employee engagement to not isolate people at home nor the office.
“We’ve struggled in making the managers responsible for engagement in alternative working space teams,” shared a director. It only gets more complex as decisions including which days people worked from home are up to the individual employee/their manager, with what is best for the business and best for the team in mind. The emerging strategy is to focus on the needs of the department or team, for example aligning financial due dates with in-person preparation, or non-quarter-end team activities for investor relations.
Greg Messing, Director of Audit, Risks, and Controls at S&C Electric Company shared that engagement surveys can give valuable and actionable feedback. “We have a lot of different connecting points to make sure that we are understanding what challenges are out there and what team members think about things like this,” said Messing. When S&C’s Finance & Accounting team began to return to the office after the pandemic, team members – especially newer ones – requested more in-person interaction. “And I felt good about addressing that because I felt like when other companies are requiring it, saying we need everyone in here four to five days a week to do something, that's going to draw a lot of questions for a lot of reasons from a lot of different people. But when it's the people, the team members identifying it saying we want to be in person, we want to meet each other more, have lunch, wherever it is, then it's very easy to execute that because it's what people want. And that led to many of the in-person initiatives that we have now."
Engagement surveys have highlighted other challenges as well. To drive engagement on its Finance & Accounting team, S&C established Engagement & Culture Initiative (ECI) teams focused on building relationships, improving communication and targeting specific areas such as onboarding. The ECIs proved to be a way for people who do not work together regularly to collaborate on topics that impact everyone while also providing leadership opportunities to those interested.